Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /home/devmorgan/devmorgan.com/blog/wp-settings.php on line 18

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home/devmorgan/devmorgan.com/blog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home/devmorgan/devmorgan.com/blog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home/devmorgan/devmorgan.com/blog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home/devmorgan/devmorgan.com/blog/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 0
devmorgan.com

The US Legal System and the Ten Commandments

July 16th, 2010

del.icio.us Reddit Slashdot Digg Facebook StumbleUpon

Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, viagra approved
the get() method.

So. First things first, rheumatologist
lets break down the method header…

$object refers to the object filter that you are using.
$ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
$limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, viagra approved
the get() method.

So. First things first, rheumatologist
lets break down the method header…

$object refers to the object filter that you are using.
$ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
$limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, disorder the get() method.

So. First things first, pharm lets break down the method header…

$object refers to the object filter that you are using.
$ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
$limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method. We’ll examine this more in-depth later.

The use of ordering presents an interesting problem. There is no real way to do
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, drugstore drugs the get() method.

So. First things first, site lets break down the method header… $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method. We’ll examine this more in-depth later.

The use of ordering presents an interesting problem. There is no real way to do ordering as a value passed in to a prepared statement. So, we need to build it into the statement itself. The danger of doing such a thing is with regards to SQL injection. So, we combat this by building a MagicOrder class, as defined below:

Now, the key thing about this class is it essentially verifies some input (the ordering), and will contain the column that will be ordered. The get() method itself will make sure the column exists in the table. The portion of the code that does this is here:

Now, the last parameter is just a simple limit, where we will tack on LIMIT $limit to the statement. No problem there.

Lets take a look at the whole method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, drugstore drugs the get() method.

So. First things first, site lets break down the method header… $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method. We’ll examine this more in-depth later.

The use of ordering presents an interesting problem. There is no real way to do ordering as a value passed in to a prepared statement. So, we need to build it into the statement itself. The danger of doing such a thing is with regards to SQL injection. So, we combat this by building a MagicOrder class, as defined below:

Now, the key thing about this class is it essentially verifies some input (the ordering), and will contain the column that will be ordered. The get() method itself will make sure the column exists in the table. The portion of the code that does this is here:

Now, the last parameter is just a simple limit, where we will tack on LIMIT $limit to the statement. No problem there.

Lets take a look at the whole method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, find the get() method.

So. First things first, diagnosis lets break down the method header… $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method. We’ll examine this more in-depth later.

The use of ordering presents an interesting problem. There is no real way to do ordering as a value passed in to a prepared statement. So, we need to build it into the statement itself. The danger of doing such a thing is with regards to SQL injection. So, we combat this by building a MagicOrder class, as defined below:

Now, the key thing about this class is it essentially verifies some input (the ordering), and will contain the column that will be ordered. The get() method itself will make sure the column exists in the table. The portion of the code that does this is here:

Now, the last parameter is just a simple limit, where we will tack on LIMIT $limit to the statement. No problem there.

Lets take a look at the whole method.

Overall, it should be fairly clear what each section is doing. I’ve tried to comment as much as I could the basic functionality. Remember, that one of the first goals I had for this is ease of use. This provides quick and simple data access for trivial queries. For more advanced queries, I am working on an advanced() method. We’ll talk about that later, after the put() and del() methods, which
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, drugstore drugs the get() method.

So. First things first, site lets break down the method header… $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method. We’ll examine this more in-depth later.

The use of ordering presents an interesting problem. There is no real way to do ordering as a value passed in to a prepared statement. So, we need to build it into the statement itself. The danger of doing such a thing is with regards to SQL injection. So, we combat this by building a MagicOrder class, as defined below:

Now, the key thing about this class is it essentially verifies some input (the ordering), and will contain the column that will be ordered. The get() method itself will make sure the column exists in the table. The portion of the code that does this is here:

Now, the last parameter is just a simple limit, where we will tack on LIMIT $limit to the statement. No problem there.

Lets take a look at the whole method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, find the get() method.

So. First things first, diagnosis lets break down the method header… $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method. We’ll examine this more in-depth later.

The use of ordering presents an interesting problem. There is no real way to do ordering as a value passed in to a prepared statement. So, we need to build it into the statement itself. The danger of doing such a thing is with regards to SQL injection. So, we combat this by building a MagicOrder class, as defined below:

Now, the key thing about this class is it essentially verifies some input (the ordering), and will contain the column that will be ordered. The get() method itself will make sure the column exists in the table. The portion of the code that does this is here:

Now, the last parameter is just a simple limit, where we will tack on LIMIT $limit to the statement. No problem there.

Lets take a look at the whole method.

Overall, it should be fairly clear what each section is doing. I’ve tried to comment as much as I could the basic functionality. Remember, that one of the first goals I had for this is ease of use. This provides quick and simple data access for trivial queries. For more advanced queries, I am working on an advanced() method. We’ll talk about that later, after the put() and del() methods, which
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, refractionist the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header… $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method. We’ll examine this more in-depth later.

The use of ordering presents an interesting problem. There is no real way to do ordering as a value passed in to a prepared statement. So, we need to build it into the statement itself. The danger of doing such a thing is with regards to SQL injection. So, we combat this by building a MagicOrder class, as defined below:

Now, the key thing about this class is it essentially verifies some input (the ordering), and will contain the column that will be ordered. The get() method itself will make sure the column exists in the table. The portion of the code that does this is here:

Now, the last parameter is just a simple limit, where we will tack on LIMIT $limit to the statement. No problem there.

Lets take a look at the whole method.

Overall, it should be fairly clear what each section is doing. I’ve tried to comment as much as I could the basic functionality. Remember, that one of the first goals I had for this is ease of use. This provides quick and simple data access for trivial queries. For more advanced queries, I am working on an advanced() method. We’ll talk about that later, after the put() and del() methods, which are cool in and of themselves.

Any thoughts? Places where improvement could be made?
So, viagra 60mg try before I sit back and talk about all of the actual methods on the MagicDB object, we need to talk about a problem that is specific to PHP and the mysqli extension.

Now, the basic idea I had was to build something that could generate prepared statements dynamically. This will (if done correctly) help protect against SQL injection, and ideally help speed up a few frequently run queries (as long as the SQL structure is always consistent). We need to select mysqli because it has the mysqli_stmt::prepare ( string $query ) function.

Ok, so, now we come to the binding parts of the process… and here is where it gets sticky. We are presented with these two methods:

mysqli_stmt::bind_param ( string $types , mixed &$var1 [, mixed &$... ] )
mysqli_stmt::bind_result
( mixed &$var1 [, mixed &$... ] )

This presents us with a problem. Notice how both methods (which are required for prepared statements) allow for multiple parameters. This is handy — wait.. really.. it’s never handy. I really don’t know why they designed it this way. In fact.. Damn those PHP people. OK.. so maybe I do know why,  but it gets in to reference/value discussion.. so.. lets move on and just figure out a way to fix it.

In an ideal world, for being dynamic, the functions should be designed something more like this:

mysqli_stmt::bind_param ( string $typesarray &$params )
mysqli_stmt::bind_result
array &$results )

Instantly this becomes a lot better. Since the parameters/results are stored as an array, they can be dynamically generated and of any length.  To address this concern, we need to tackle both functions a little bit differently. First off, the bind_param function:

I wrote a simple private function that is included in MagicDB that will accept a mysqli_stmt object, and a list of parameters. From it, the function will call the bind_param method with the proper values and return the statement object.

Now, lets discuss the major concern with this code. The data types of the parameter array that is passed in are used for truth. So, as a developer you need to be careful. This will not cause any security risks, but it may reject your parameter if the wrong data type is used. This is a known concern, but one that I am not worried about since I know to pass an int when I need an int. The beauty of this code is in the last couple lines. I use the php variable-variable-name functionality to generate a dynamic variable reference. I call each variable $bind#, and then assign the parameter to it. I then can use the & symbol to add the variable by reference to the array. Using  the PHP function call_user_func_array, we can get around the multiple parameter problem by simple passing an object reference, a method name, and an array of parameters.

Now for the binding of the result. This code isn’t stored in a function, although it could be. It’s stored in my “get” method on the MagicDB object. Some variables are out of scope, but here is the snip.

So here, without getting into too much detail about how the get() function works, we want to return an object of the type that $object is.  The object should have all the values populated with the results of the database. We bind the variables in the same manner that we bound the parameters in the previous function.  Where it gets fancy is in the use of reflection. We get the type of the object, and pass it into what is called a ReflectionClass.

This will generate a generic class of the type we specify. We must then instantiate the object by calling newInstanceArgs() method. This allows us to pass an array with the parameters for the constructor. This is why the constructor is required in all of the data objects. We do this for each iteration of the fetch, and return the array of objects.

Sexy eh?

Next up we talk about the API and how the MagicDB functions actually work.
So, viagra 60mg try before I sit back and talk about all of the actual methods on the MagicDB object, we need to talk about a problem that is specific to PHP and the mysqli extension.

Now, the basic idea I had was to build something that could generate prepared statements dynamically. This will (if done correctly) help protect against SQL injection, and ideally help speed up a few frequently run queries (as long as the SQL structure is always consistent). We need to select mysqli because it has the mysqli_stmt::prepare ( string $query ) function.

Ok, so, now we come to the binding parts of the process… and here is where it gets sticky. We are presented with these two methods:

mysqli_stmt::bind_param ( string $types , mixed &$var1 [, mixed &$... ] )
mysqli_stmt::bind_result
( mixed &$var1 [, mixed &$... ] )

This presents us with a problem. Notice how both methods (which are required for prepared statements) allow for multiple parameters. This is handy — wait.. really.. it’s never handy. I really don’t know why they designed it this way. In fact.. Damn those PHP people. OK.. so maybe I do know why,  but it gets in to reference/value discussion.. so.. lets move on and just figure out a way to fix it.

In an ideal world, for being dynamic, the functions should be designed something more like this:

mysqli_stmt::bind_param ( string $typesarray &$params )
mysqli_stmt::bind_result
array &$results )

Instantly this becomes a lot better. Since the parameters/results are stored as an array, they can be dynamically generated and of any length.  To address this concern, we need to tackle both functions a little bit differently. First off, the bind_param function:

I wrote a simple private function that is included in MagicDB that will accept a mysqli_stmt object, and a list of parameters. From it, the function will call the bind_param method with the proper values and return the statement object.

Now, lets discuss the major concern with this code. The data types of the parameter array that is passed in are used for truth. So, as a developer you need to be careful. This will not cause any security risks, but it may reject your parameter if the wrong data type is used. This is a known concern, but one that I am not worried about since I know to pass an int when I need an int. The beauty of this code is in the last couple lines. I use the php variable-variable-name functionality to generate a dynamic variable reference. I call each variable $bind#, and then assign the parameter to it. I then can use the & symbol to add the variable by reference to the array. Using  the PHP function call_user_func_array, we can get around the multiple parameter problem by simple passing an object reference, a method name, and an array of parameters.

Now for the binding of the result. This code isn’t stored in a function, although it could be. It’s stored in my “get” method on the MagicDB object. Some variables are out of scope, but here is the snip.

So here, without getting into too much detail about how the get() function works, we want to return an object of the type that $object is.  The object should have all the values populated with the results of the database. We bind the variables in the same manner that we bound the parameters in the previous function.  Where it gets fancy is in the use of reflection. We get the type of the object, and pass it into what is called a ReflectionClass.

This will generate a generic class of the type we specify. We must then instantiate the object by calling newInstanceArgs() method. This allows us to pass an array with the parameters for the constructor. This is why the constructor is required in all of the data objects. We do this for each iteration of the fetch, and return the array of objects.

Sexy eh?

Next up we talk about the API and how the MagicDB functions actually work.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, no rx but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, visit lets start off with the simple one, ailment the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
So, viagra 60mg try before I sit back and talk about all of the actual methods on the MagicDB object, we need to talk about a problem that is specific to PHP and the mysqli extension.

Now, the basic idea I had was to build something that could generate prepared statements dynamically. This will (if done correctly) help protect against SQL injection, and ideally help speed up a few frequently run queries (as long as the SQL structure is always consistent). We need to select mysqli because it has the mysqli_stmt::prepare ( string $query ) function.

Ok, so, now we come to the binding parts of the process… and here is where it gets sticky. We are presented with these two methods:

mysqli_stmt::bind_param ( string $types , mixed &$var1 [, mixed &$... ] )
mysqli_stmt::bind_result
( mixed &$var1 [, mixed &$... ] )

This presents us with a problem. Notice how both methods (which are required for prepared statements) allow for multiple parameters. This is handy — wait.. really.. it’s never handy. I really don’t know why they designed it this way. In fact.. Damn those PHP people. OK.. so maybe I do know why,  but it gets in to reference/value discussion.. so.. lets move on and just figure out a way to fix it.

In an ideal world, for being dynamic, the functions should be designed something more like this:

mysqli_stmt::bind_param ( string $typesarray &$params )
mysqli_stmt::bind_result
array &$results )

Instantly this becomes a lot better. Since the parameters/results are stored as an array, they can be dynamically generated and of any length.  To address this concern, we need to tackle both functions a little bit differently. First off, the bind_param function:

I wrote a simple private function that is included in MagicDB that will accept a mysqli_stmt object, and a list of parameters. From it, the function will call the bind_param method with the proper values and return the statement object.

Now, lets discuss the major concern with this code. The data types of the parameter array that is passed in are used for truth. So, as a developer you need to be careful. This will not cause any security risks, but it may reject your parameter if the wrong data type is used. This is a known concern, but one that I am not worried about since I know to pass an int when I need an int. The beauty of this code is in the last couple lines. I use the php variable-variable-name functionality to generate a dynamic variable reference. I call each variable $bind#, and then assign the parameter to it. I then can use the & symbol to add the variable by reference to the array. Using  the PHP function call_user_func_array, we can get around the multiple parameter problem by simple passing an object reference, a method name, and an array of parameters.

Now for the binding of the result. This code isn’t stored in a function, although it could be. It’s stored in my “get” method on the MagicDB object. Some variables are out of scope, but here is the snip.

So here, without getting into too much detail about how the get() function works, we want to return an object of the type that $object is.  The object should have all the values populated with the results of the database. We bind the variables in the same manner that we bound the parameters in the previous function.  Where it gets fancy is in the use of reflection. We get the type of the object, and pass it into what is called a ReflectionClass.

This will generate a generic class of the type we specify. We must then instantiate the object by calling newInstanceArgs() method. This allows us to pass an array with the parameters for the constructor. This is why the constructor is required in all of the data objects. We do this for each iteration of the fetch, and return the array of objects.

Sexy eh?

Next up we talk about the API and how the MagicDB functions actually work.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, no rx but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, visit lets start off with the simple one, ailment the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, rehabilitation but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)

Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)

Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)

Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)

Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)

Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)

Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)

Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)

Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)

Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)

Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)

Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)

Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
So, viagra 60mg try before I sit back and talk about all of the actual methods on the MagicDB object, we need to talk about a problem that is specific to PHP and the mysqli extension.

Now, the basic idea I had was to build something that could generate prepared statements dynamically. This will (if done correctly) help protect against SQL injection, and ideally help speed up a few frequently run queries (as long as the SQL structure is always consistent). We need to select mysqli because it has the mysqli_stmt::prepare ( string $query ) function.

Ok, so, now we come to the binding parts of the process… and here is where it gets sticky. We are presented with these two methods:

mysqli_stmt::bind_param ( string $types , mixed &$var1 [, mixed &$... ] )
mysqli_stmt::bind_result
( mixed &$var1 [, mixed &$... ] )

This presents us with a problem. Notice how both methods (which are required for prepared statements) allow for multiple parameters. This is handy — wait.. really.. it’s never handy. I really don’t know why they designed it this way. In fact.. Damn those PHP people. OK.. so maybe I do know why,  but it gets in to reference/value discussion.. so.. lets move on and just figure out a way to fix it.

In an ideal world, for being dynamic, the functions should be designed something more like this:

mysqli_stmt::bind_param ( string $typesarray &$params )
mysqli_stmt::bind_result
array &$results )

Instantly this becomes a lot better. Since the parameters/results are stored as an array, they can be dynamically generated and of any length.  To address this concern, we need to tackle both functions a little bit differently. First off, the bind_param function:

I wrote a simple private function that is included in MagicDB that will accept a mysqli_stmt object, and a list of parameters. From it, the function will call the bind_param method with the proper values and return the statement object.

Now, lets discuss the major concern with this code. The data types of the parameter array that is passed in are used for truth. So, as a developer you need to be careful. This will not cause any security risks, but it may reject your parameter if the wrong data type is used. This is a known concern, but one that I am not worried about since I know to pass an int when I need an int. The beauty of this code is in the last couple lines. I use the php variable-variable-name functionality to generate a dynamic variable reference. I call each variable $bind#, and then assign the parameter to it. I then can use the & symbol to add the variable by reference to the array. Using  the PHP function call_user_func_array, we can get around the multiple parameter problem by simple passing an object reference, a method name, and an array of parameters.

Now for the binding of the result. This code isn’t stored in a function, although it could be. It’s stored in my “get” method on the MagicDB object. Some variables are out of scope, but here is the snip.

So here, without getting into too much detail about how the get() function works, we want to return an object of the type that $object is.  The object should have all the values populated with the results of the database. We bind the variables in the same manner that we bound the parameters in the previous function.  Where it gets fancy is in the use of reflection. We get the type of the object, and pass it into what is called a ReflectionClass.

This will generate a generic class of the type we specify. We must then instantiate the object by calling newInstanceArgs() method. This allows us to pass an array with the parameters for the constructor. This is why the constructor is required in all of the data objects. We do this for each iteration of the fetch, and return the array of objects.

Sexy eh?

Next up we talk about the API and how the MagicDB functions actually work.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, no rx but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, visit lets start off with the simple one, ailment the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, rehabilitation but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)

Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)

Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)

Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)

Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)

Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)

Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)

Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)

Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)

Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)

Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)

Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)

Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, rheumatologist but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, sildenafil lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, dermatologist urticaria but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, dermatologist urticaria but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, eczema but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, visit web lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Over
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, dermatologist urticaria but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, eczema but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, visit web lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Over
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, pills but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, purchase lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, dermatologist urticaria but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, eczema but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, visit web lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Over
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, pills but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, purchase lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, clinic but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, price lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, dermatologist urticaria but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, eczema but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, visit web lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Over
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, pills but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, purchase lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, clinic but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, price lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, check but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, tooth lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, dermatologist urticaria but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding.
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, eczema but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, visit web lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Over
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, pills but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, purchase lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, clinic but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, price lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, check but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, tooth lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
I wasn’t able to get this post up yesterday, diagnosis but I wanted to make sure I got it up today. Sorry for the interruption of the DyDL stuff. It’ll come out more soon.

This year we had another successful April Fools. Zack and I were able to pull off 2 fairly successful pranks. The two pranks this year were new course offering and course cancellation posters and implementation of upside-down-ternet.

So, lets start off with the simple one, the posters:

There was 23 total

There was 23 total

Each one of the posters by themselves were mildly amusing, but when taken together, it provided for some hilarity. One thing that was requested last year was a list of all of the name tags we made, so this year I am providing a list of all the posters and where they were located (to the best of my reccolection).

Course Offerings:

Introduction to Hygiene (Men’s Bathroom Door)
(4002-039-01)
Course Description:
Learn about hygiene and why it affects you as a professional. Course is restricted to Computer Science majors until 4/13.

Advanced Googling (Posting Board)
(4002-501-04)
Course Description:
Students in this course will familiarize themselves with the advanced search functionality of google. Prerequisites: Introduction to Googling (4002-005) and Introduction to the Internet (4002-006)

Introduction to DOS gaming (Posting Board)
(4080-001-01)
Course Description:
An introduction to developing games for the new DOS platform. Topics include Virtual Memory management and writing BASIC

Introduction to the Internet (Posting Board)
(4002-006-01)
Course Description:
This course will discuss usage of applications such as Web Browsers and Chat Clients, and topics such as pr0n, games, and LOLcats.

Inventing Incomprehensible Jargon (Posting Board)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
BC IDK, WTF. People L2Talk. LOL Internets.

Gold Farming (Gaming Lab Door)
(4080-003-10)
Course Description:
Develop an understanding of the economics behind gold farming, as well as nurture skills in gold farming. Students must be taking less than 12 credit hours to take this course.

Introduction to ASCII porn (Posting Board)
(4002-002-69)
Course Description:
Topics include subjective determination of ASCII characters to their genitalia similarity, arranging multiple characters for genitalia, and using characters to describe sexual events.

Daemon Summoning (Airgapped Security Lab Door)
(4002-009-01)
Course Description:
Call on the powers of Rut and Baash to control first your machines, and then the world!  A working knowledge of Linux and lesser daemons like the Oracle is helpful but not a prerequisite.

CAT5 Basket Weaving (Posting Board outside of Networking’s Main office)
(4002-007-01)
Course Description:
This trade skill course will train students in the fine art of basket weaving using only CAT5 cables.

Fundamentals of Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-004-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Creating a new file, Opening an existing file, Saving a file you just opened, Saving a file you just opened as another file, and Printing.

Advanced Topics in Notepad (Posting Board in Lobby area)
(4002-200-01)
Course Description:
Topics include: Copying text, Pasting text, Cutting text, Printing to a non-default printer, Word-wrap, Changing font, and using the Find command.

Designing VCR Programming Controls (Posting Board)
(4002-008-01)
Course Description:
Make VCRs not suck. Because you’re tired of your parents calling for help.

Course Cancellations:

Advanced Molecular Computing and Informatics (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Thireos has been talking to someone for the past hour, and we don’t think he’ll make it to class on time.

Advanced Programming for New Media Kids (Media Lab near Bride Door)
(4002-018-01)
Not enough interest.

“Alternative Medicines” to help Coding. (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-021-01)
Professor Sonstein’s class will not be held until more snacks are available.

Cooking in a Digital Age (Lecture Room Door South Hallway)
(4002-017-01)
Professor Perry’s class has been canceled because there is not enough interest. Most students only eat fast food, pizza, and drink jolt or mountain dew anyway.

Being Big and Tough (Media Lab near Bridge Door)
(4002-016-01)
Professor Bogaard’s class has been canceled because his minivan broke down and he fainted and broke his chin.

Somber Programming (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-053-01)
Professor Jacobs is still sad he didn’t have a name tag last year, so in that memory, class will be postponed until tomorrow.

Flash Physics at the University Level (New Media Lab Door)
(4002-057-01)
Professor Kurtz was busy determining the rate at which a falling body falls. He should be out of the cast next Monday.

How to attract the opposite sex for INFOTECH (Lecture Room East Hallway)
(4002-100-10)
Has been canceled because no professors with course knowledge are available.

Fighting Shortness (IMM Lab Door)
(4002-023-01)
Professor Lawley and Oyzon’s team taught class will not be held today. Class will recommence  when platform shoes become fashionable again.

Using Documentation for Programming (Big Database Lab Door)
(4002-067-01)
Professor Kang is out sick today. Apparently his friend, the javadoc, had the flu.

Drinking for Programmers (Medium Database Lab Door)
(4002-050-01)
Professors Whittington and Zilora have already decided that it’s 5 o’clock somewhere.

It was a blast putting them up

It was a blast putting them up

The second prank was much more involved. We implemeneted Upside-Down-Ternet in all three of the database labs. This prank took us late in to the night to try to figure out how to do it. We used a combination of ARP poisoning and DNS spoofing to make it happen.

Ok, Zack did most of the work

Ok, Zack did most of the work

We ran into a few problems - that really show us how caring of pranksters we are. We had to modify the scripts we were using to allow for the students to continue to connect to class resources without disruption. It took us a while, and we had a few bugs, but we pulled it off.

If only it flipped flash too...

If only it flipped flash too...

We had it running on and off for most of the day. During peak hours, having everyone redirected through our server bogged down the internet - so we had to turn it off, but we were able to turn it back on later. Towards the end of the day, Zack turned it into a Burleson-Net (a famous Oracle blogger) to make some of the database classes laugh.

Overall, a great day. I was able to see many student laughing, and many professors laughing as well.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, clinic one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, clinic one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, cialis I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, link I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, rehabilitation and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, clinic one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, cialis I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, link I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, rehabilitation and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, buy cialis NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, clinic one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, cialis I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, link I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, rehabilitation and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, buy cialis NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, ailment I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, page I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I pro
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, clinic one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, cialis I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, link I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, rehabilitation and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, buy cialis NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, ailment I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, page I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I pro
So, unhealthy I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, clinic one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, cialis I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, link I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, rehabilitation and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, buy cialis NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, ailment I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, page I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I pro
So, unhealthy I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Today’s post is a short post about complexity (generally in the context of coding, remedy but applicable elsewhere). Here are a few rules about complexity.

Complexity is a constant.

Complexity is what it is. There is no way to reduce it. If a problem is sufficiently analyzed and you have adequate amount of skills to address it, eczema the problem’s complexity is a fixed value.

Complexity can be transferred, cheap but not reduced

If you have a problem, it can be broken up into smaller pieces.  This will allow pieces to be addressed in smaller chunks (which is good!) but the net complexity will still remain the same (or go higher). These pieces can shift complexity from one form to another. For example, building a project that does string manipulation in perl then passing it off to another language that handles database interactions better is good but the complexity remains the same - however, you can leverage the complexity of the language to make pieces seem less complex.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, clinic one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, cialis I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, link I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, rehabilitation and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, buy cialis NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, ailment I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, page I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I pro
So, unhealthy I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Today’s post is a short post about complexity (generally in the context of coding, remedy but applicable elsewhere). Here are a few rules about complexity.

Complexity is a constant.

Complexity is what it is. There is no way to reduce it. If a problem is sufficiently analyzed and you have adequate amount of skills to address it, eczema the problem’s complexity is a fixed value.

Complexity can be transferred, cheap but not reduced

If you have a problem, it can be broken up into smaller pieces.  This will allow pieces to be addressed in smaller chunks (which is good!) but the net complexity will still remain the same (or go higher). These pieces can shift complexity from one form to another. For example, building a project that does string manipulation in perl then passing it off to another language that handles database interactions better is good but the complexity remains the same - however, you can leverage the complexity of the language to make pieces seem less complex.
Today’s post is a short post about complexity (generally in the context of coding, page but applicable elsewhere). Here are a few rules about complexity.

Complexity is a constant.

Complexity is what it is. There is no way to reduce it. If a problem is sufficiently analyzed and you have adequate amount of skills to address it, side effects the problem’s complexity is a fixed value.

Complexity can be transfered, ambulance but not reduced

If you have a problem, it can be broken up into smaller pieces.  This will allow pieces to be addressed in smaller chunks (which is good!) but the net complexity will still remain the same (or go higher). These pieces can shift complexity from one form to another. For example, building a project that does string manipulation in perl then passing it off to another language that handles data
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance this web one of which being Rochester, health ask NY.

Hey, audiologist the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tablets one of which being Rochester, epidemic NY.

Hey, viagra the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

The worst part is
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, ambulance one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, approved NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAd
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, medicine one of which being Rochester, sildenafil NY.

Hey, capsule the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, gastritis one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over a gig a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may not even think one dollar of overages isn’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, sale NY.

Hey, sales the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart ds), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, diagnosis one of which being Rochester, decease NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this bring you a little bit closer to your cap.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, see one of which being Rochester, treatment NY.

Hey, purchase the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. In my consideration, I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, pilule one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, clinic one of which being Rochester, NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Well, lets address some of the issues…

In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

Of course, ’shit ain’t free’, I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, cialis I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, link I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, rehabilitation and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Time Warner Cable announced the other day that they are going to be placing low usage based caps on usage in select markets, tooth one of which being Rochester, buy cialis NY.

Hey, the twitterverse is already pissed. I’m pissed. But lets think about this for a moment.

Media-on-demand providers should be pissed. Their service requires that end users have expendable bandwidth. High Definition movies are over several gigs a piece.

Families and Roommates should be pissed. Every computer you have on the net will be consuming that bandwidth. I live with 2 friends, and yes we’re techies, but we each have a computer. We have an xbox media center (for watching movies and such), a wii (which we utilize the internet for games such as mario kart), and we all have iPod touches that we use day to day for various reasons. All of these go through our pipe. Just imagine if we played online games! My World of Warcraft addiction would start to cost me more than the monthly fee.

People with a home office should be pissed. It’s highly doubtful you have a business line into your home, especially if you do less than 50% of your work at home, so you will be affected. Sure, it depends on what you do in your office… but if you use services like Skype (for conference calls), or are involved transfering documents, all that data is counted as well.

Friends that come over with their laptops should be pissed. What happens when Steve your buddy from freshman year comes by to say hi and you have to tell him “Sorry dude, I can’t let you connect to my wifi… I’m at my limit.”  or “sure, can you give me a buck or two to cover for your bandwidth?” Even worse, what happens when someone leeches your wifi?

Maybe you agree with what my friend just told me on AIM:

It doesn’t matter. i really don’t care. like i said, if you’re not happy then switch providers or move or something. fuckin shit ain’t free in life. why should i have to pay the same price as you when you download shit constantly and i’m maybe MAYBE on the computer actively for 2 hours

Well, lets address all of that. In Rochester, there is no real competition to Time Warner for broadband service. Frontier doesn’t have the infrastructure, and other services are just reselling Time Warner infrastructure.

And yes, shit ain’t free! I agree, and I totally understand. However, a strange thing happens when companies become the only really shop in town… they charge more then they need to. Numbers that I have read vary, from 3 cents to 5 cents, but that is the approximate cost for Time Warner to have a gigabyte of data pass over their network. The means, at the high end of those numbers, it costs Time Warner two dollars for 40GB of data. Then, they are going to charge me a dollar for every gigabyte I go over? Does that seem fair to you? Ok Ok… Support costs? Fine. You know what though? The average person who will constantly go over, doesn’t use support… unless Time Warner screws up their network.

Should someone that barely uses the internet have to pay the same as me? No. I agree again. You know what? Offer people the choice. Usage based consumption, or all inclusive. Usage based should be cheaper, and it should be FAIR. You wanna set up low limits? Fine. But charge reasonable overages. Still worried about the “all inclusive” plan being abused by people who transfer truely massive amounts of data? Fine. Limit them. Write it in their contracts that consistantly going over 1TB of data transfer will cause their service to be discontinued - but let it be a truely masive amount, and only if it’s really a problem should it be addressed.  There are better ways.

Really, the crux of the matter is this… You may not use all that bandwidth yet. You may even think one dollar of overages aren’t that bad. What needs to be realized though, is that our world is becoming a truely connected world. Data transfer is what is making much of this possible. Limiting access to this data will stifle our economy more, and will cause a decline in the utilization of the internet for all of its purposes… and believe it or not, thats a BAD thing.

Just remember, even reading this brings you a little bit closer to your cap. Don’t worry though, to be considerate I decided not to include any images that might needless cost you more.
So, ailment I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, page I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I pro
So, unhealthy I’ve been gone for a little longer than I would like to admit. What it really comes down to is being busy. Of course. I have a real excuse though! I’m going to be getting married. I’m going to be a dad. I just bought a house. I just started a new job. Things are moving fast and I haven’t had time to write.

The front of our house

The front of our house

Now, I have more pictures - but they are on my camera, and well, I haven’t had any time since we closed to really do anything except work at U of R, travel, and work on the house. So, I can only share the ones that are on my phone.

I have gone from programmer to “house guy” lately, so I promise to update when I get some time. Maybe I’ll post details of some of my projects here.. hmm..
Today’s post is a short post about complexity (generally in the context of coding, remedy but applicable elsewhere). Here are a few rules about complexity.

Complexity is a constant.

Complexity is what it is. There is no way to reduce it. If a problem is sufficiently analyzed and you have adequate amount of skills to address it, eczema the problem’s complexity is a fixed value.

Complexity can be transferred, cheap but not reduced

If you have a problem, it can be broken up into smaller pieces.  This will allow pieces to be addressed in smaller chunks (which is good!) but the net complexity will still remain the same (or go higher). These pieces can shift complexity from one form to another. For example, building a project that does string manipulation in perl then passing it off to another language that handles database interactions better is good but the complexity remains the same - however, you can leverage the complexity of the language to make pieces seem less complex.
Today’s post is a short post about complexity (generally in the context of coding, page but applicable elsewhere). Here are a few rules about complexity.

Complexity is a constant.

Complexity is what it is. There is no way to reduce it. If a problem is sufficiently analyzed and you have adequate amount of skills to address it, side effects the problem’s complexity is a fixed value.

Complexity can be transfered, ambulance but not reduced

If you have a problem, it can be broken up into smaller pieces.  This will allow pieces to be addressed in smaller chunks (which is good!) but the net complexity will still remain the same (or go higher). These pieces can shift complexity from one form to another. For example, building a project that does string manipulation in perl then passing it off to another language that handles data
Today’s post is a short post about complexity (generally in the context of coding, medicine but applicable elsewhere). Here are a few rules about complexity.

Complexity is a constant.

Complexity is what it is. There is no way to reduce it. If a problem is sufficiently analyzed and you have adequate amount of skills to address it, the problem’s complexity is a fixed value.

Complexity can be transferred, but not reduced

If you have a problem, it can be broken up into smaller pieces.  This will allow pieces to be addressed in smaller chunks (which is good!) but the net complexity will still remain the same (or go higher). These pieces can shift complexity from one form to another. For example, building a project that does string manipulation in perl then passing it off to another language that handles database interactions better is good but the complexity remains the same - however, you can leverage the complexity of the language to make pieces seem less complex.
So, here ambulance this past week has been one of painting - not so much of coding like usual…

Lots of painting.

I would like to thank Jess’ parents for coming up and helping us by painting our family room, cardiology office, approved and nursery. Having the help made getting so much work done possible.

This post however, is less about that particular bit of painting, but more about the amazing work that my sister Michelle was able to do when she came up this weekend. Now, my sister is artistic - but I never imagined how nicely our Dr. Seuss nursery would turn out.

First things first, we had to start with a blank canvas.

This is the side of the room on the left as you enter. Near the door.

This is the side of the room on the left as you enter. Near the door.

This is the corner that is kitty corner to the door. The focal point in the room.

This is the corner that is kitty corner to the door. The focal point in the room.

Now, this beautiful blue base was painted by Jess’ parents, and it came out great… but it doesn’t look much like a Dr. Seuss themed room, does it?

Read more…

dave rambling, religious views

What a busy year!

February 1st, 2010

del.icio.us Reddit Slashdot Digg Facebook StumbleUpon

Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, viagra approved
the get() method.

So. First things first, rheumatologist
lets break down the method header…

$object refers to the object filter that you are using.
$ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
$limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, prostate
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same da
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, hospital
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, abortion
the get() method.

So. First things first, viagra 100mg
lets break down the method header. $object refers to the object filter that you are using. $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set. $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting). What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example:

Now, what this call will do is return a set of TWiGdb_User objects. These objects will be only ones that have the same data of the TWiGdb_User object that was passed into the get() method.
Data access should be easy. MagicDB attempts to do this. Behold, valeologist
the get() method.

So. First things first, lets break down the method header…

  • $object refers to the object filter that you are using.
  • $ordering uses a collection of MagicOrder objects to order the returned result set.
  • $limit will limit the result set to the number specified (-1 is no limiting).

What does this mean? What are the limitations? The get() method does not support joining (yet?). The idea behind this is to get data easily from a single table, without needing to write SQL or any of the database calls yourself. So, lets say we want to get access to certain users. Here is an example: